Got a favourite app, smartphone, tablet, camera or any other bit of kit from 2013? Then make sure you cast your vote now...
Samsung Galaxy S3 v iPhone 4S v HTC One X: camera
Camera
The iPhone 4S is good enough to replace a point-and-shoot camera in most instances. It's quick, sharp and simple to use. Pictures have warm, natural colours and are generally well exposed. The HTC One X camera is similarly capable but has more bells and whistles. You can jump from the lock screen to taking a photo in 0.7 seconds, take up to 99 shots just by holding down the 'capture' button and produce still shots while filming high-definition video. The 8MP camera on the Galaxy S3 suffers in comparison with the rest of that phone's high-end features. It takes perfectly good shots, of course, and the 1.9MP front-facing camera is a welcome addition. But, in our opinion, the HTC One X's superb snapper takes the prize.
Winner: HTC One X
Full review: Samsung Galaxy S3
Full review: Apple iPhone 4S
Full review: HTC One X
Search for deals on smartphones with Ciao
related stories on msn
Samsung and HTC have been ahead of Apple for well over a year now. The gaps were very visible with the first gen Galaxy and Desire HD.
Anyone saying and thinking otherwise is either an Apple fanboy or hasn't had a Samsung/HTC high-end phone in his/hers hands.
Where Apple leads by a massive distance is brand, convergence (everything on one device) and to a lesser extent usability. The main criticism of Apple is its proprietary system which locks users in and also traps them into paying huge (unjustifiable) additional sums of money for hardware components that do not cost very much, e.g. bigger memory versions.
Apple users need to get their heads around the fact they are buying fashion not best in class technology. Nothing wrong in that but let's not pretend it's the other way around 'cos as an engineer I can tell you it ain't.
I just got a smart phone, the Galaxy S second hand. I have watched movies on it straight from the server using Allshare and to be honest when using such a small screen the extra definition that the IPhone has is of no importance what is important is that at such a high resolution movement is not so sharp. I had a weekend playing with an IPhone and my biggest grip with it is that everything has to be done through Apple software. I can't copy my music on to it or more to the point copy a couple of tracks of my music without it creating a pairing with my machine which then deletes all the music from the machine it's normally synced with.
The cost of anything Apple is always more and it does not stop with just the hardware, take I Tunes for example. Stuff is much cheaper in normal MP3 format.
As to getting to grips with Android, well that a load of bull. The same could be said of Apple if its your first smart phone. You give an IPhone t an android user and they will have a problem to start with, do it the other way round and ditto. It's like Linux and Microsoft users swapping PC's.
Battery use, well that depends on how many calls you make and for how long hence it is not really that simple to compare. My Galaxy, so often complained about for it's short battery life, lasts two weeks if left on and not used (I left it behind when I went on a two week holiday by accident which is how I know), I guess an IPhone would last just as long.
I like the fact that Android software is either free or a nominal price plus I can actually find things I can seriously use. I am sure there are some good Apple apps but far less choice and a lot more money.
At the end of the day it's down to cost and it has to be said there is a bigger android choice at much lower prices and given the little small differences I would prefer an android phone to an IPhone.
I can hardly begin to even guess at the level of exchanges that might have taken place if the issues were of some importance. Get a grip - they are just phones!
I do not think I will bother and just keep my ordinary phone just to make and receive
calls, does not even have a camera but it does the job so why spend so much money
that will only be out of date in another year and it seems you have to keep updating really!
too much money I guess,
I have a Samsung S3.6 sold as an MP3 player with loads of extra features just like the S3 but without the phone capability(under £200).
Considering you can buy a full function Mobile for under £40, how do the manufacturers justify asking nearly £500 for a few phone bits.
I suspect we are all being taken for a ride by the smartphone industry, and the longer we put up with it the more we will have to pay for a few extra bits costing probably no more than £20.
You all may laugh.............
Does anyone make a mobile phone that only makes phone calls?????????
Or are we going back to the eighties!
it all comes down to samsung galaxy or htc.
i like samsung more
Sorry folks but I still use my faithfull Nokia 6610, mobile for making calls. Never lets me down.
![]()
latest tech videos
Microsoft's new gaming console is due to go on sale in late 2013
Date 22/05/13, Duration 1:32, Views 1350
Video by: Press Association | MSN News MSN Week In Pictures
-
Xbox One unveiled in US
Date 22/05/13 1:32Tooltip Information:
Xbox One unveiled in USVideo by:Description: Microsoft's new gaming console is due to go on sale in late 2013Rating: 4Views: 1350
-
William in Help for Heroes plea
Date 20/05/13 1:47Tooltip Information:
William in Help for Heroes pleaVideo by:Description: Prince William is calling on the public to continue their support of injured British servicemen and womenRating: 4Views: 1073
-
More killings in Iraq
Date 20/05/13 1:38Tooltip Information:
More killings in IraqVideo by:Description: At least 70 people are dead after a string of car bombs and shootings in Shiite and Sunni areas of IraqRating: 4Views: 258
-
Grandmother died over 'bedroom tax' fear
Date 12/05/13 1:38Tooltip Information:
Grandmother died over 'bedroom tax' fearVideo by:Description: A grandmother killed herself because of the Government's 'bedroom tax' according to her family.Rating: 4Views: 15246































